Parliament worse than no parliament

Government offices and services would continue
effectively if the March 2019 New South Wales elections were cancelled.

Government across Australia will improve without parliaments and the corrupt parties.

Before any polling day, our children are embarrassed at the grotesque antics of all the candidates and their parties.

After every polling day, members of the parliament and their party connections debase themselves and deceive you as they attempt to divert Crown resources into their capital connections' wallets.

The political parties and parliaments are unable to protect Australian revenues and virtue.

The All Australian Peoples National Congress guarantees your Australian future.

Australia Constitution has no mandate

People of the 1890s in Australia had conceptions of the Universe, the Earth, her all peoples, health and wealth and personal opportunities, of  fewer dimensions than people, say of Australia in 2015AD. 

But even in Australia in the 1890s, the majority of people did not vote for the Australian Constitution.

In the United States of America, there are increasing (please see) calls for reconsideration of the national civilian administration's institutions' interrelationships. It must seem an insurmountable edifice, the redrafting of the Constitution of the United States. The moon too far.

Likewise in Australia, there is a formidable fence surrounding the castellated fort of the affixation of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp) to our better known land, Terra Nullius, aka Australia Fair. 

We never forget our antecedents, theirs and our neighbours, and their enduring spirits of service, and we are inspired by their exemplified gifts of imagination and adaptability.

The Australia Constitution is not Australian, but an enactment of a foreign parliament, the British Imperial Parliament at Westminster in London.

And the Australia Constitution is mere paper, say as distinct from the Biblical Ten Commandments. You can't repeal a divine Act, even with a Senate majority. 

Others will assert the trail of Westminster and Australia Acts of the Westminster and Australian parliaments subsequently exclude any but Australian parliaments from legislating to the Australian common. That's a contestable proposition, having regard to trades, treaties and customs, at least.

The Constitution is only paper prescriptions, penned before Pluto was not known not to be a planet.

None of these paper statutes may withstand at law the express will of a Peoples Divine Empress in Court and Congress of Republic, which is a politically convenient and expedient narrative in gain of a wealthier and amply secured future for the Australasian peoples and our neighbours by the repeal of the inefficient Australian federal system and replacement by unified congress and professional senates with provincial delegations maintaining Commonwealth and States appearances and traditions.

How the Australia Constitution came to be affixed to the real estate was by voting for approval. Please see >>

Also from Wikipedia the following: 
"In 1901, the six Australian colonies united to form the federal Commonwealth of Australia. The first election for the Commonwealth Parliament in 1901 was based on the electoral laws at that time of the six colonies, so that those who had the right to vote and to stand for Parliament at state level had the same rights for the 1901 Australian Federal election. 
Only in South Australia (since 1894) and Western Australia (since 1899) did women have a vote. Tasmania retained a small property qualification for voting, but in the other states all male British subjects over 21 could vote.
Only in South Australia and Tasmania were indigenous Australians even theoretically entitled to vote. A few may have done so in South Australia. 
Western Australia and Queensland specifically barred indigenous people from voting."

So a lot of people of the nations of the country could not vote on the Australia Constitution. 
And of the few who were allowed to vote, most in fact did not vote in approval of the Constitution. 

Faithfully extrapolating from the vote counts of the referendums of the late 1890s on the Commonwealth Constitution: see here >>, one can see that 422,604 votes were cast in approval of the Constitution but 577,666 votes were cast against or failed to vote.

The Australian Constitution has never been put to the Australian electorate, except for a few amendments permitted by the torturous path imposed by section 128

In pidgin law, that section is a clog on the equity of redemption, of nations. 

For that reason, too, the Constitution may be safely repealed, even on appro, in the manner suggested.

#Australia parliaments crackers

This Australia parliamentary system is crackers. Everyone in Australia knows that.

The MPs rort everything, sound stupid, and hunt sinecures, while inflicting reductions and terror on the people. 

And there is no reason to accept except that parliamentary, executive, delegatory and associated contractor misbehaviour will widen, worsen, without relief to the common of these islands, unless.

What's behind unless need not be said to be better when compared to what the stupid parliamentary system will inflict on us next in the name of government.

HMAS Australia is sluggish, low

Systems of government in any country endure when their peoples are content and safe. They are the first two degrees of freedom.

That is not circumstance of the Australian peoples in 2017AD. It is also not the circumstance of the peoples of the United States of America.

If the country's peoples are not content and safe, the government system must change.

Our country may be usefully regarded as an aircraft carrier, with many passengers and crew. Let's call her HMAS Australia. She's majesty - not because of an English regnate of honourable past service tradition now passed on to our hands - but because she, our boat, is obliged to safe carriage, guided by the light of the origin of the stars and the seas.

In 2017, HMAS Australia is sluggish, low in the water, making no real headway but, in decreasing, erratic circles, with many fires on board, mad drunks and fop pooh-bahs slapping and seducing each other for turns at the several steering wheels, rifling the general quarters, hollering discordance through old hat megaphones, some engines set some forward, some backwards, some rusted, their pistons seized up, on every deck the personnel in unhappy circumstances.

Unfortunately uneducated steersmen are promoting as spectacle of throwing off the decks the bodies of other people, shrieking those souls born of love of God, as "illegal".

If the analogy is apt, it is without reasonable contention other than that the beloved old hulk requires smart refurbishment.

Misconduct at sea is either piracy or mutiny, neither ever anywhere tolerable by wise and loving fathers. Mutiny and piracy are mere behaviours of natural persons who are possessed of conceits unreflective of the spirit of humanity.

The parliamentary cliques throughout Australia follow these false notions. In the 20th century, such bore violent international disputations of no merit.

Out of Australia in the past decade there has been joined false wars. It is clear that the proponents of the false overseas wars are urging more such, for private gain by revenue defalcation.

Our neighbours' sons and daughters prefer the noble and happy futures of freedom, prosperity, and realisation of the great frontiers which beckon us in international comity.